In the view of our society at
large, a teacher must exhibit certain attributes in order to be deemed
‘good’. There is not exactly an official list of necessary
characteristics written in stone, but most of the population seems to adhere to
a decent amount of unspoken but agreed upon ideals. Educators must be in full
control without turning into a wickedly stern presence in the classroom, we
must be meaningfully creative and just plain interesting without allowing chaos
to take over, and we should certainly be cultured but not to the point of
possible pretentiousness. We must find the perfect line to walk along, it
seems. This ideal has proved to be intimidating to me to different degrees at
different times.
Over the course of my own
experience with the teacher education program, I have grappled with the issue
of finding balance. I have reached the conclusion that it is not an end goal. I
am not going to achieve balance one day and then just be able to coast along
happily without any real faults for the rest of my career. I am
going to have to adjust for every hour and there will undoubtedly be long
stretches of time where I do well, but there will also absolutely be weeks
where I will be too relaxed, perhaps only to then become too harsh afterwards
to overcompensate. I will have to wear many proverbial hats as an educator: for
one kid I might have to be tough to produce the right results, for another I may
have to be sweet and more lenient to generate success. My teaching styles will
constantly need to evolve in order for my work to be effective, and while I am
never going to find the flawless balance that will endure forever, I can
consistently improve.
One of the most prevalent areas of
concerns for me in regards to balance has to deal with helpfulness; I believe
most citizens would say that a teacher should be helpful but not limiting. I
struggle in this area; my CT last year noted that I was knowledgeable but could
be much too quick to give away answers or step in to redirect a group
discussion too early. Letting the learning process unfold without
hindering it with too much intervention is one aspect of teaching that I have a
sizeable amount of anxiety over.
I felt like I had reached my
victory moment when, at the end of last year, my university supervisor for Core
II pointed out that I did well at encouraging students to search for answers
themselves, asking them further questions so they could discover facts for
themselves rather than just sharing information with them. I felt great and
figured I was over one major hurdle.
I encountered the same
issue again, however, working with an English Language Learner. I was given the
chance to work with him one-on-one this week for two days. During our first
session, he was extremely respectful and attentive after having been quite loud
and disruptive in the classroom. I was a little giddy; I had taken a student
outside the main classroom for some individual attention and he was responding
favorably; clearly all was well. We finished half his project right then and
there. However, upon reflection, I realized that I had limited him in a very
real way; I had directed his choices too much and he had gotten the work done
but I was in no way sure that it was truly meaningful with him. His personality
was not shining through in his finished product. Thus, when given
the opportunity to work with him again the next day, I was eager but less
gung-ho about exactly how I thought he should complete each task. I
followed the advice of Jessica Fries-Gaither (2008), given in her article “Questioning
Techniques: Research-Based Strategies for Teachers”, where she encouraged
teachers to probe for further information via questioning when a partial answer
is given, rather than elaborate themselves. Fries-Gaither states that “Research…
shows that redirection and probing are effective when they are explicitly
focused on student responses. Vague or critical feedback (such as “That’s not
right, try again”) has been shown to be unrelated to achievement,” (2).
Reading this was a wake-up call for me. I needed to cease and desist with the
simple answers and insubstantial feedback. Instead, I gave him directions but
allowed some long silences. I did not directly answer all his questions but
told him to do what he felt would be best, prompting him with further questions
to get him to dig deeper into his own ideas rather than molding him into
following along with mine. The results, though only from one day so far, were
quite amazing. His finished map and passage analysis were far superior to the
parts of the assignment we’d worked on earlier and he simply seemed happier at
the end of the day. This positive experience has fueled my desire to keep
learning good questioning strategies and developing a better method of helping
students without putting a damper on their natural abilities by substituting
them with my own.
Moving forward, I
would like to research and implement more questioning strategies. It is an area
of infinitely possibilities. There may not be one universal, everlasting
balance between asking questions and providing facts but I can and will make
progress in this area. I will keep you all updated!
References:
Fries-Gaither, J. (2008.) Questioning Techniques:
Research-Based Strategies for Teachers. Retrieved August 31, 2015.